Principle of legality and judicial discretion

Main Article Content

Lorenzo Morillas Cueva

Abstract

This paper deals with the transcendence of the principle of legality in the Rule of Law, as a presupposition of effective judicial protection. It highlights, from this dimension, its impact on the system of penalties and, of both, on the application of the law in the courts, in the determination and application of those, to be solved on the basic principles of modern criminal law and guaranteeing the Rule of Law. The normative requirement of reasoned sentences prevails as a consequence of the objective reasoning of the content and interpretation by judges and courts. All of this is shown and developed in the relevant importance of the required motivation of sentences, a guarantee of compliance with legality, effective judicial protection and legal certainty; as well as in the responses to the opposite situation, that is to say the lack of motivation or insufficient motivation. To this end, the most outstanding opinions of scientific doctrine and jurisprudence are highlighted, both in terms of the content and scope of the principle of legality, the fundamental support of the Rule of Law, and in the system of penalties, from a preventive, general and special perspective, in order to guide the final study to the binomial motivation-non-motivation and its judicial treatment, the essential basis of this intervention.

Article Details

How to Cite
Morillas Cueva, L. (2025). Principle of legality and judicial discretion. Justice and Law, 7–32. Retrieved from https://revistajd.tsp.gob.cu/index.php/JD/article/view/242
Section
Vademecum
Author Biography

Lorenzo Morillas Cueva, Professor of Criminal Law and Professor Emeritus, University of Granada, Spain

The author is also Dr. Honoris Causa Multiple and Honorary Researcher of the Andalusian Inter-University Institute of Criminology; author and director of more than 200 publications on Criminal Law (general and special) and Criminology; he has a distinguished academic activity, both nationally and internationally; he has been recognised by the University of Granada and is the director of the journal Cuadernos de Política Criminal.

References

Barquín Sanz, J. (2000). Sistema de sanciones y legalidad penal. Aequitas, (58), 171-212.

Besio Hernández, M. (2011). Los criterios legales y judiciales de individualización de la pena. Tirant Lo Blanch.

Castelló Nicás, N. (2007). Arbitrio judicial y determinación de la pena en los delitos dolosos. Comares.

Conde, R. (1968). Sociedad, Estado y Derecho en filosofía marxista. Cuadernos para el Diálogo.

Feuerbach, A. R. (1832). Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschaland gültigen peinlichen Rechts. Giessen.

Hassemer, W. (1984). Fundamentos del Derecho penal. Bosch.

Mir Puig, S. (2016). Derecho penal. Parte general (10.ª ed. actualizada y revisada, con la colaboración de Gómez Martín y Valiente Ibáñez). Reppertor.

Morillas Cueva, L. (1978). Derecho penal e ideología. En Derecho y economía en la sociedad española actual, 30-68. UNED.

Morillas Cueva, L. (2002). Reflexiones sobre el Derecho penal del futuro. Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología, (4), 1-23. http://criminet.ugr.es/recpc/recpc_04-06.pdf

Morillas Cueva, L. (2021). Sistema de Derecho penal. Parte general. Dykinson.

Quintero Olivares, G. (1981). Introducción al Derecho penal. Bosch.

Quintero Olivares, G. (2015). Parte general del Derecho penal. Aranzadi.

Roxin, C. (1998). Dogmática penal y política criminal. Idemsa.

Roxin, C. (2008). Fundamentos político-criminales del Derecho penal. Hammurabi.

Roxin, C. y Greco, LL. M. (2020). Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil (5ª Aufl.). C-H.BECK.

Schultz, H. (1966). Kriminalpolitische Bemerkungen zum Entwurf eines Strafgesetzbuches, E 1962. JuristenZeitung, (4).

Welzel, H. (1987). Derecho penal alemán. Parte general (12.ª ed. alemana, 3.ª castellana). Editorial Jurídica de Chile.

Van Zyl Smit, D. y Snacken, S. (2013). Principios de Derecho penal y Política penitenciaria europea. Penología y derechos humanos. Tirant Lo Blanch.